INTRODUCTION
In January of 2005 Danbury presented to HVCEO that City's
plan to study the use of Candlewood Lake as a source of water
supply. As the nearby towns of Brookfield, New Milford, Sherman
and New Fairfield have significant land area within the Candlewood
Watershed, Danbury was seeking to establish a mechanism for
communication as it proceeds.
It was
also agreed early in 2005 that the potential for water main
interconnections between Danbury and other communities would
be studied. It was agreed that HVCEO would be the sponsor
of the interconnection study.
This would be for the purpose of determining if towns are
interested in helping to fund the Danbury water supply expansion
and then receive some of the water supply newly available.
The
town by town results are found in the following sections:
--- SECTION
2; CONNECT TO CENTRAL BETHEL
---
SECTION
3: CONNECT TO NORTHERN BETHEL
---
SECTION
4: CONNECT TO SOUTHERN BROOKFIELD
---
SECTION
5: DANBURY'S INTERNAL NEEDS
---
SECTION 6: CONNECT TO NEW FAIRFIELD
---
SECTION
7: CONNECT TO SOUTHERN NEW MILFORD
---
SECTION
8: CONNECT TO NEWTOWN
---
SECTION
9: CONNECT TO RIDGEFIELD
Study
components approved by HVCEO include 1) Collect information
and prepare a summary of water supply needs for the towns
of Brookfield, Danbury, Ridgefield, Bethel, New Fairfield,
Newtown and New Milford; 2) Evaluate the City of Danbury's
distribution system and the potential for interconnections
with the surrounding towns; and 3) Identify and prepare budget
estimates for the costs for pumping stations, pipelines, and
operational expenses to serve each town with water from Danbury
to meet projected future needs.
It was determined
early on that three towns in the planning region, Bridgewater,
Redding and Sherman, would not be included in this interconnection
study. The reason was the combination of their remoteness
from Danbury coupled with lack of need.
It is
not the intent of Danbury or HVCEO to spread potentially growth
inducing water supplies out from central areas to more outlying
locations. Rather, where a town is seeking new sources of
supply for properly planned growth, the option of interconnection
with Danbury could now be considered as such decisions are
made.
In return, Danbury is seeking formal partners in financing
the development of Candlewood Lake as a supply source.
Pease note that in the texts above the important term "hydraulic
grade line" (HGL) is used frequently. In simple terms,
a water system's hydraulic grade line is the elevation to
which its water will rise if unrestricted and at which the
pressure will be zero. An example would be the overflow elevation
of an elevated storage tank.
As an
overview for the region, Table 1 below shows the additional
water supply needs by town for 2004, 2009, 2020 and 2050 in
order to meet projected demands with a 15 percent margin of
safety. The projections were taken and or extrapolated from
existing water supply plans, except for Brookfield and New
Fairfield, where no plans were available.
TABLE
1
SUMMARY OF ADDITIONAL SOURCE OF SUPPLY NEEDS
BY TOWN, IN MILLION GALLONS PER DAY (MGD)
| Town |
2004 |
|
2009 |
2020 |
2050 |
| Bethel |
0 |
|
0.007 |
0.03 |
0.06 |
| Brookfield |
0 |
|
0.2 |
0.5 |
1.0 |
| Danbury |
0 |
|
0 |
1.0 |
2.0 |
| New
Fairfield |
0 |
|
0.015 |
0.02 |
0.02 |
| New
Milford |
0.06 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0.67 |
| Newtown |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Ridgefield |
0 |
|
0 |
0 |
0.4 |
|
Total |
0.06 |
|
0.22 |
1.55 |
4.15 |
| Note
1: New Milford without Well No. 5. |
|
|
|
|
|
MAIN
WATER PAGE BETHEL
BRIDGEWATER
BROOKFIELD
DANBURY
NEW
FAIRFIELD NEW
MILFORD
NEWTOWN
REDDING
RIDGEFIELD
SHERMAN
|